Develop a QCA7000 board?

Development and discussion of fast charging systems eg Chademo , CCS etc
User avatar
uhi22
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 3:20 pm
Location: Ingolstadt/Germany
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by uhi22 »

Another improvement: There was confusion regarding the PP variant. Now added a pick-list, which hopefully makes the selection easier.
image.png
image.png (5.82 KiB) Viewed 4116 times
The detailled check revealed, that the former conclusion "ppvariant=1 is fine for Foccci 4.5" is wrong. Because, as long as the solder bridge is not closed, there is NO pull down. So variant 2 is the right one. Updated the wiki regarding this. (And to be precise, in 4.5 there is the additional diode, which would need a small adaption in the calculation to be fully correct.)
image.png
User avatar
johu
Site Admin
Posts: 6070
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:52 pm
Location: Kassel/Germany
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 1206 times
Contact:

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by johu »

And to be even more precise Johannes replaced the 3k pull down with a good enuff standard 3k3 😉

But yeah, precision isn't so important here as the cable current steps are far apart
Support R/D and forum on Patreon: https://patreon.com/openinverter - Subscribe on odysee: https://odysee.com/@openinverter:9
User avatar
uhi22
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 3:20 pm
Location: Ingolstadt/Germany
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by uhi22 »

Got the version 5 boards from JLC. Still the QCAs not soldered, just powered up.
When increasing the supply voltage from 8V to 15V, observed an increasing current. This is not normal, because usually the step-down regulator will draw less current when the voltage increases (constant power). So the question is: Where does the increasing current come from?
User avatar
johu
Site Admin
Posts: 6070
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:52 pm
Location: Kassel/Germany
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 1206 times
Contact:

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by johu »

Did you measure the supply rails? What changes did we make since 4.5a that tested fine?
Support R/D and forum on Patreon: https://patreon.com/openinverter - Subscribe on odysee: https://odysee.com/@openinverter:9
User avatar
uhi22
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 3:20 pm
Location: Ingolstadt/Germany
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by uhi22 »

Not sure whether 4.5 was better, I did not have a close look to the current, and now all are gone.
The 3.3V and 5V are fine.
User avatar
uhi22
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 3:20 pm
Location: Ingolstadt/Germany
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by uhi22 »

Found the reason for increased supply current: The enable pin of the steop-down is specified to be max 7V, and not intended to feed voltage into. When adding a 10k in series to the enable pin, the unexpected current is gone. Even better could be a diode.
image.png
image.png
image.png
User avatar
johu
Site Admin
Posts: 6070
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:52 pm
Location: Kassel/Germany
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 1206 times
Contact:

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by johu »

Oh!
Good thing you found it before I ordered the new batch. How hard is it to add the series resistor?
Diode would have to be Zener type. Diode to 5V rail would probably inhibit wake up
Support R/D and forum on Patreon: https://patreon.com/openinverter - Subscribe on odysee: https://odysee.com/@openinverter:9
User avatar
celeron55
Posts: 793
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 3:04 pm
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 36 times
Been thanked: 130 times
Contact:

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by celeron55 »

I think uhi22 meant a diode in series. No? To only allow current to flow out from the EN pin.
User avatar
uhi22
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 3:20 pm
Location: Ingolstadt/Germany
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by uhi22 »

Adding the series resistor is just scratching some copper and wiring the resistor, this is no problem for the five parts on my desk.
image.png
Finding 2: The R52 and R64 are corrected to 1k in the schematic, but not updated in the pcb, so the BOM contained 10k, which leads to unintended wakeup. Need to fix this on the physical boards, and check whether syncing the board to the schematic works without destroying too much.
User avatar
uhi22
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 3:20 pm
Location: Ingolstadt/Germany
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by uhi22 »

celeron55 wrote: Tue Jul 09, 2024 7:41 am I think uhi22 meant a diode in series. No? To only allow current to flow out from the EN pin.
Exactly.
User avatar
johu
Site Admin
Posts: 6070
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:52 pm
Location: Kassel/Germany
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 1206 times
Contact:

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by johu »

Hmm, the wakeup is based around pulling the EN pin to 12V and basically overriding the internal pull-up with the external 100k pull down.
A cleaner solution would be a part with internal pull down and EN pin designed for 12V
Support R/D and forum on Patreon: https://patreon.com/openinverter - Subscribe on odysee: https://odysee.com/@openinverter:9
User avatar
uhi22
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 3:20 pm
Location: Ingolstadt/Germany
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by uhi22 »

Yes, the idea with the diode is exactly this. The diode and the pull-down resistor provide the functionality "low by pull-down, and driving to 12V enables the regulator"
image.png
The point A is nearly 0V during sleep, because the ~2µA pull-up current inside the IC is not sufficient to over-rule the 100k+diode. When applying anything between 5V and 20V to the supply, the point A follows this, and the diode prevents feeding the 20V to the IC. The internal pull-up current of the TPS pulls the EN to high (no matter whether this is 2V, 5V or 7V). Everything fine.
User avatar
johu
Site Admin
Posts: 6070
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:52 pm
Location: Kassel/Germany
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 1206 times
Contact:

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by johu »

Now I get it, perfect!
Can you make the change?
Support R/D and forum on Patreon: https://patreon.com/openinverter - Subscribe on odysee: https://odysee.com/@openinverter:9
User avatar
uhi22
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 3:20 pm
Location: Ingolstadt/Germany
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by uhi22 »

Any proposal for a small footprint Schottky diode?
User avatar
johu
Site Admin
Posts: 6070
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:52 pm
Location: Kassel/Germany
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 1206 times
Contact:

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by johu »

Support R/D and forum on Patreon: https://patreon.com/openinverter - Subscribe on odysee: https://odysee.com/@openinverter:9
User avatar
uhi22
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 3:20 pm
Location: Ingolstadt/Germany
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by uhi22 »

Thanks. Used the smaller one. Schematic and board updated (including the R52 and R64). Also fixed the rotation issues.
Still the v5 boards need soldering the QCA and further testing.
User avatar
johu
Site Admin
Posts: 6070
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:52 pm
Location: Kassel/Germany
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 1206 times
Contact:

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by johu »

Now of course I'm wondering how much of a problem is this for the boards already out there? Will the regulator overheat from this? How many mA go into the pin?
Support R/D and forum on Patreon: https://patreon.com/openinverter - Subscribe on odysee: https://odysee.com/@openinverter:9
Landsi
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2024 7:10 pm
Has thanked: 8 times

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by Landsi »

Hi!

On a whim, I ordered 2 populated foccci’s yesterday (I am far from ready to seriously think about CCS - but the project is just too cool :) )

Anyway, FYI, JLCPCB was picky about the footprint of L13 - see image. They would have placed it, but “without right to complain”

I have not the means to make a pull request - zero skills in that regard - but thought it might be useful info, in case i got lucky and was the first to get that feedback from jlc …
Attachments
IMG_0701.jpeg
Plan to build someday soon<TM>:

VW T3 Bus
Leaf Motor Stack incl Transaxle
Brat Industries VW Driveshaft Adapters
(Leaf 40kwh Battery incl BMS) Model 3 55 kwh Battery w/ BMS
Foccci CCS
Zombieverter VCU
User avatar
uhi22
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 3:20 pm
Location: Ingolstadt/Germany
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by uhi22 »

johu wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 7:11 pm Will the regulator overheat from this? How many mA go into the pin?
Added a 1 ohm shunt at the enable pin to measure the current, depending on the supply voltage.

supply voltage [V] | current [mA]
7 | 0
8 | 0.4
9 | 0.8
10 | 1.4
12 | 3.4
13 | 19.2
14 | 41
15 | 61 Hot, touch longer than one second hurts. No smoke yet.
Did not further increase to avoid damage.

I see these solution options:
(A) If the DCDC never provides more than 14V, just live with the small heat. (Most likely the DCDC will provide more than 14V.)
(B) If the sleep/wakeup is not needed, just remove the two transistors, the diode and the 100k pull-down. This leads to "always on".
(C) If sleep/wakeup is needed, just live with the heat and hope that the regulator will survive.
(D) If sleep/wakeup is needed, cut the copper to the enable pin, and solder a diode (or a 10k resistor like I did on the V5 boards).

I'd propose B or D, these are the technical clean solutions. For just experimenting also (C) is okay, but no long term recommendation.
User avatar
uhi22
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 3:20 pm
Location: Ingolstadt/Germany
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by uhi22 »

Landsi wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 8:23 pm JLCPCB was picky about the footprint of L13 - see image. They would have placed it, but “without right to complain”
That's funny. I orderd the V5 two weeks ago, and there was no complaint at that time. I added the topic on the todo list.
User avatar
johu
Site Admin
Posts: 6070
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:52 pm
Location: Kassel/Germany
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 1206 times
Contact:

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by johu »

Well this post is already superseded by "the Buschtrommel" (aka Signal) which led to this: https://github.com/uhi22/ccs32clara/issues/24

Drove back from holiday today and charged while walking around a lake. Unfortunately when we returned to the car the session had stopped at 66%. So I started again and waited in the car. 18 Minutes later my "neighbor" on the same Alpitronic charger left and a new car plugged in. In that instant my charging session got interrupted again.

Uwe already reproduced it and it is Clara still listening to SLAC while the connection is already established

On other news I briefly charged at 92 kW (250A) but a very metallic burn smell quickly let me dial it back to 180A.
Support R/D and forum on Patreon: https://patreon.com/openinverter - Subscribe on odysee: https://odysee.com/@openinverter:9
tom91
Posts: 1580
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2019 9:15 pm
Location: Bristol
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 295 times

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by tom91 »

I noticed that Johu had mentioned he flashes the "chademo" can mapping in a different thread: viewtopic.php?p=72966#p72966

I have started to look at the Zombie Implementation so the question around a "standard CAN map" has arisen.

Can you please share the format of these messages? Any inclusions regarding AC charging or charge port related statuses?
Also will probably want to look at agreeing on a format for the control messages toward the Focci.
Founder Volt Influx https://www.voltinflux.com/
Webstore: https://citini.com/
User avatar
johu
Site Admin
Posts: 6070
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:52 pm
Location: Kassel/Germany
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 1206 times
Contact:

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by johu »

Yes DC charging is covered by CHAdeMO + BatteryVoltage mapping: https://openinverter.org/wiki/Foccci#Ma ... e_CAN_side

For AC charging nothing is defined on the CAN side yet.
We have values "EvseAcCurrentLimit" that is calculated from CP duty cycle, "CableCurrentLimit" calculate from PP resistance and AcObcState to remote control stateC and connector lock (0 idle, 1 connector lock, 2 state C)

Could be mapped to some unused CHAdeMO bytes for reduced CAN traffic or 1 new message in each direction
Support R/D and forum on Patreon: https://patreon.com/openinverter - Subscribe on odysee: https://odysee.com/@openinverter:9
tom91
Posts: 1580
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2019 9:15 pm
Location: Bristol
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 295 times

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by tom91 »

johu wrote: Thu Jul 18, 2024 6:32 pm For AC charging nothing is defined on the CAN side yet.
We have values "EvseAcCurrentLimit" that is calculated from CP duty cycle, "CableCurrentLimit" calculate from PP resistance and AcObcState to remote control stateC and connector lock (0 idle, 1 connector lock, 2 state C)
Could be mapped to some unused CHAdeMO bytes for reduced CAN traffic or 1 new message in each direction
Okay will take the info and populate a .DBC and review then add the missing info where possible and suggest a message form the Focci providing the Lockstate, CP ect.

Once I get my own board I will dive into having a play with the charging logic interaction between Clara and the Zombie, should be straight forward as we can copy from the LIM or my own Charge Port Controller.
Founder Volt Influx https://www.voltinflux.com/
Webstore: https://citini.com/
User avatar
uhi22
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 3:20 pm
Location: Ingolstadt/Germany
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Develop a QCA7000 board?

Post by uhi22 »

Why there are two chargers? Well, one for the Ioniq and one for the Cappuccino :-)
Worked with the ABB, but did not for the Wilbert charger. Unfortunately no laptop for logging at hand.
IMG_20240728_170832.jpg
IMG_20240728_170719.jpg
Post Reply