I guess this is the better place to post this (i.e. not the gs450h inverter temperature thread thingy).
At any rate, first try was a failure.
The inverter fits somewhat. Following notes are for LHD cars:
I used my old blown inverter's water inlet/outlet pipes (they're pressed into the main casting - just... "wiggle" them out) as 90deg. coolant hose joints, in order to use the otherwise stock coolant plumbing. The gs450h's inverter "cage" (the thing to which the power steering ECU/inverter is mounted to) obviously won't let the ls600h inverter fit (since it's a bit "wider"), but removing it and mounting the EPS ECU straight to the car's body does work (the ECU bolts to the chassis anyways - the bracket just has holes and a bit of support on one side). The fuel pipe heading into the HPFP gets pushed against said HPFP by the battery connector - solvable by either removing the noise insulation covers off the HPFP (they're stock on the ls600h, not stock but present on some 2GR-FSE-equipped cars - there's a TSB for "ticking" noise), or by rotating it - it's the rubber portion that is curved to almost a full circle, can be fitted to "curve" to the other side.
Inverter outputs when viewed head-on are W-U-V on both the ls600h and gs450h inverter - checked via techinfo.toyota.com, I also have an EU-spec ls600h manual. The difference is that the generator output is on the inside (relative to the center of the car) for the ls600h,and on the outside for the gs450h.
Battery and AC connectors are the same. The wiring diagram indicates that the AC's positive and negative poles are swapped, but I simply do not see how that can be the case, given that the assembly that has the battery & AC connectors, the AC fuse (450v 40a) and the connecting bus bars is the same between both inverters (checked) - either I'm missing something, or the LS (or maybe it's the GS?) wiring diagram is wrong on that account (EDIT: the GS diagram & DTC troubleshooting pages appear to be wrong in this regard - AC pinouts are reversed).
I used H07V-K 35mm2 cables with crimped copper terminals - 1 meter in length - to connect the inverter's terminals to the old blown inverter's MG connectors housing - I use it as an interface between the slide-in-style gs450h connectors and the bolt-on ls600h terminals. No shielding implemented.
What happpened - p0a78-306 and p0a7a-344 are set when the car attempts to "start the engine" (which is all the time when engine coolant temperature is <40deg. C - engine warmup, catalyst lightoff, etc). The "ready" light does light up for a second, then the DTCs are set right as the car attempts to crank the engine - the cranking itself sounds/looks just like when the car is set in "compression check mode" (i.e. disabled engine fuel supply and ignition).
p0a78-306 (for mg2) and p0a7a-344 (for mg1) both indicate "Motor(mg2)/Generator(mg1) torque execution monitoring malfunction" - "If the difference between the requested (MG1/MG2) torque and the actual (MG1/MG2) torque exceeds a predetermined value, the MG ECU determines that there is a malfunction in the execution or monitoring of the (MG1/MG2) torque. Then, the hybrid vehicle control ECU will illuminate the MIL and set a DTC."
The MG ECU is built into the inverter, from what I've read from the few internal presentations on the evolution of Toyota's hybrid system that I could find - there are a few more on scribd but they don't seem to want to take my money... ah well. My guess is that the MG ECU is the thing with which the HV ECU (the hybrid vehicle ECU - basically the orchestrator) is communicating via the HTM/MTH USART lines.
Unfortunately, neither DTCs' freeze frame data includes MGx exec/actual torque values, or RPMs... actually, there's just about nothing inverter related in the freeze frame data. Attempting to log the event manually wasn't much of a success - from what I gather, techstream's "snapshot" recording function doesn't run on the ECU itself, so I'm left with the relatively atrocious "few frames per second" sampling rate that I get with an adapter. Good news is that what I saw from that was promising - proper pre- and post-boost voltages are reported, motor/generator RPMs seem in line with what was expected (the engine doing maybe a single revolution and then stalling back-and-forth - tiny RPM fluctuations in mg2, somewhat larger in MG1), torque request/exec values seem "decent" too...
Not sure what to make of this. One possibility is the lack of shielding on the MG extension harness thing that I made - might be fooling the CTs, given that MG1 & MG2 cables are pretty much mixed with each other due to the way that the old inverter breakout box is arranged:
Top (original MG harness side): (MG2-W MG2-U MG2-V MG1-W MG1-U MG1-V)
Bottom (inverter internal side): (MG2-W MG1-W MG2-U MG1-U MG2-V MG1-V)
Another possibility is that I didn't repin something on the inverter connector properly - will recheck. Given the amount of care I gave that, I kind of doubt it, but we'll see.
Yet another possibility is being mislead by the wiring diagram (the AC pinout still comes to mind).
Could also be a different motor magnet/winding/etc configuration leading to "unexpected" (to the inverter) torque values.
Re: whether it works or not with the controller board - I'd say that there's a high probability that it does, given that it did at least attempt to spin the engine in the right direction
I think that's all I have to report for now, questions and insight are always welcome. Plan moving forward is to attempt to depin the MG 3 phase harness (seems possible) and convert it to a bolt terminal (nondestructively), check the wiring diagrams and the various DTC pages for every little thing again, etc, etc.