idclim vs idcspnt  [SOLVED]

Topics concerning the Tesla front and rear drive unit drop-in board
Post Reply
User avatar
Gregski
Posts: 2194
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2021 10:28 am
Location: Sacramento, California
Has thanked: 305 times
Been thanked: 397 times
Contact:

idclim vs idcspnt

Post by Gregski »

I just can't get the difference between these two Parameters despite reading the Wiki, could someone explain the difference as if I was an 8 year old please? To be specific, do I need to set both, do they both need to be the same? I am running a Tesla Model S Gen 2 onboard charger. Which I recon uses CAN to control the power modules.

idclim
  • This parameter is mainly relevant for CAN operation. It is transmitted via CAN to let the vehicle know how much DC current the charger can deliver.

(Each charger module maxes out at about 15.5A so the maximum total charging current is 46.5A. Since the total power is also limited to 10 kW it depends on the output voltage as well. There is no need to be exact on this, the firmware will automatically limit the AC input current to each module to the hardware maximum.)

idcspnt Direct Current Setpoint? What's a setpoint?
  • DC charge current limit.
  • An additional limit to charge power.
  • It is also mapped to the CAN bus so if you have a BMS that calculates a maximum charge current you can forward this to the charger.
"I don't need to understand how it works, I just need to understand how to make it work!" ~ EV Greg
User avatar
johu
Site Admin
Posts: 5682
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:52 pm
Location: Kassel/Germany
Has thanked: 153 times
Been thanked: 960 times
Contact:

Re: idclim vs idcspnt  [SOLVED]

Post by johu »

It has to do with the CHAdeMO protocol.
idclim has absolutely now influence to charger operation, it only communicates to the car how much current the charger is able to deliver. So when not running CHAdeMO this parameter is irrelevant.

idcspnt sets the DC current that the combined 3 chargers should deliver.
Support R/D and forum on Patreon: https://patreon.com/openinverter - Subscribe on odysee: https://odysee.com/@openinverter:9
User avatar
Gregski
Posts: 2194
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2021 10:28 am
Location: Sacramento, California
Has thanked: 305 times
Been thanked: 397 times
Contact:

Re: idclim vs idcspnt

Post by Gregski »

johu wrote: Tue Jan 11, 2022 10:45 am It has to do with the CHAdeMO protocol.
idclim has absolutely now influence to charger operation, it only communicates to the car how much current the charger is able to deliver. So when not running CHAdeMO this parameter is irrelevant.

idcspnt sets the DC current that the combined 3 chargers should deliver.
thank you, I really like how you explained that, would it be ok for me to add that to the Wiki?

just playing around with a super basic charging diagram schematic for absolute newbs

Charging.jpg
"I don't need to understand how it works, I just need to understand how to make it work!" ~ EV Greg
User avatar
johu
Site Admin
Posts: 5682
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:52 pm
Location: Kassel/Germany
Has thanked: 153 times
Been thanked: 960 times
Contact:

Re: idclim vs idcspnt

Post by johu »

Gregski wrote: Tue Jan 11, 2022 4:01 pm would it be ok for me to add that to the Wiki?
Yes, please :)
Support R/D and forum on Patreon: https://patreon.com/openinverter - Subscribe on odysee: https://odysee.com/@openinverter:9
User avatar
qmedia2651
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2020 4:13 am
Location: Orlando Florida, USA

Re: idclim vs idcspnt

Post by qmedia2651 »

Thanks a lot I was confused too.
Post Reply